clarify

rep is not spending more the elite group. it is taking less away from those creating the most wealth to those creating less.

there is no right or wrong for this.

just there is always a balance between equity and efficiency.

when you take too much from the more efficient group, it will reduce the incentives to work hard, and make the overall pie smaller.

just my 2c.

所有跟帖： 

• 顶There is always a balance between equity and efficiency -千里66- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 12:06:24

• That's the point -Bluesea_Bluesea- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 12:08:24

• 你说的这个不过是个借口。好比俺对博后说, 现在多放些钱在实验上, 拿到多的Grant,你不但工资涨的更多还可以升职。 -知人知面- ♂ (94 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 12:23:39

• I am totally lost by your analogy -njrookie- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 12:31:57

• 我的意思很简单，那就是竞争和效率是个非常好的借口。就好像公平博爱是民主党的借口。 -知人知面- ♂ (229 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 12:47:29

• The difference is -junkyarddo- ♂ (204 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 12:51:45

• you can say, postdoc earns it. right? same thing here. -知人知面- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 12:53:11

• No, postdoc earns what the boss pays to him. -JunkYarDDo- ♂ (178 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 12:55:33

• 如果你仔细看看我写的。我说的是republican所谓减税是假的。Bush减了税，但是他 -知人知面- ♂ (57 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 13:00:20

• No entirely right. -JunkYarDDo- ♂ (658 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 13:09:25

• 你这个是破书袋子。实际上还是要花那么多。你看看共和党总统都是减税的。 -知人知面- ♂ (195 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 13:19:31

• “抛书袋子”呵呵。写错了no offence。 -知人知面- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/07/2013 postreply 13:20:04