agree,

来源: kukuren2000 于 2012-03-22 20:36:45 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (587 bytes)

agree, C0 should definitely Not be ignored, and most of time, it is negative in fact.

and when there is a conflict between NPV and IRR on an investment evaluation,  the correct answer is provided by NPV. 


所有跟帖： 

• There are circumstances where the NPV rule and IRR rule -kukuren2000- ♀ 给 kukuren2000 发送悄悄话 (1503 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:07:28

• IRR model is totally wrong. Considering if you have multi IRRs. -sweetptt- ♂ 给 sweetptt 发送悄悄话 sweetptt 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:19:47

• yes, IRR model is more limited. -kukuren2000- ♀ 给 kukuren2000 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:28:25

• IRR是分析是否值得投资，而NPV是计算具体回报，两者相互相成，一点都不冲突 -大家帮我买房- ♂ 给 大家帮我买房 发送悄悄话 大家帮我买房 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 08:01:26

• kukuren2000是明白人 -大家帮我买房- ♂ 给 大家帮我买房 发送悄悄话 大家帮我买房 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 07:59:53

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！