agree,

来源: kukuren2000 2012-03-22 20:36:45 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (587 bytes)

agree, C0 should definitely Not be ignored, and most of time, it is negative in fact.

and when there is a conflict between NPV and IRR on an investment evaluation,  the correct answer is provided by NPV. 


所有跟帖: 

There are circumstances where the NPV rule and IRR rule -kukuren2000- 给 kukuren2000 发送悄悄话 (1503 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:07:28

IRR model is totally wrong. Considering if you have multi IRRs. -sweetptt- 给 sweetptt 发送悄悄话 sweetptt 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:19:47

yes, IRR model is more limited. -kukuren2000- 给 kukuren2000 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:28:25

IRR是分析是否值得投资,而NPV是计算具体回报,两者相互相成,一点都不冲突 -大家帮我买房- 给 大家帮我买房 发送悄悄话 大家帮我买房 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 08:01:26

kukuren2000是明白人 -大家帮我买房- 给 大家帮我买房 发送悄悄话 大家帮我买房 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 07:59:53

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”