咱追求的目标不是,法律面前人人平等吗?咋一下就变成保护弱着叻?
而且弱和强本来就是相对概念,咋衡量? 还有从啥角度衡量, 经济地位,身体健壮程度?谁说了算啊? 如果美国法律是建立在这个基础上,那可真就完蛋了。
基本逻辑都不通
所有跟帖:
•
回复:基本逻辑都不通
-olddog3-
♂
(552 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
12:26:24
•
回复:回复:基本逻辑都不通
-olddog3-
♂
(104 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
12:28:30
•
"镇压F***功是一种国家犯罪行为"。yes !!!!
-longtermInvestor-
♂
(16 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
12:57:12
•
well, just believe whatever you want
-大猪头-
♂
(21 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
13:04:08
•
it is still "人人平等", no matter who made the crime,
-longtermInvestor-
♂
(197 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
13:02:00
•
那保护弱者从哪里来?
-大猪头-
♂
(164 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
13:12:29
•
回复:那保护弱者从哪里来?
-olddog3-
♂
(234 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
13:25:26
•
that is it ?
-大猪头-
♂
(358 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
13:49:06
•
保护弱者 comes from the practice of law,
-longtermInvestor-
♂
(189 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
15:05:07
•
那么两个富人打官司,或者两穷人叻?
-大猪头-
♂
(426 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
15:49:02
•
I am talking about reality, you are talking about
-longtermInvestor-
♂
(132 bytes)
()
11/19/2008 postreply
16:22:15