U班言过了。我想我最后一段引文应该说明我不是园饺子:-)其实

本帖于 2012-04-08 22:10:04 时间, 由普通用户 chicago80 编辑

我是希望D800在astrophotography上有优势的,原因很简单,我现在用的是D300。

时至今日,(execuse me for using English from here on as entering Chinese in iPad is painful :-<) Canon indeed is still evidently more popular than Nikon among astrophotographers.One evidence: Nebulosity, a quite polular affordable astroimaging software, just released its v3 in Feb 2012. Try finding Nikon in the supported camera pulldown menu ... you will be disappointed.   

For the age of the links: yes, they are old and I warned your eyes ;-). But I believe the credibility is not as weak as their age suggests, given the status quo of DSLR applications in astrophotography as well as the credibility of Jerry Rodriguss, who just published an artical about using DSLR for planet imaging in the latest issue of Sky & Telescope magazine, which is an influential magazine in amateur astronomer community world wide. And the other link was referred in Jerry's website.

You may have over interpreted my sentiment in this topic. But I always like your philosophical way of thinking a lot and am often amazed and amused by the great sense of humor and the penertrating power of your comments. 

所有跟帖: 

我用D300拍的星空非常令人失望,一贯的。 -U96- 给 U96 发送悄悄话 U96 的博客首页 (529 bytes) () 04/07/2012 postreply 09:59:05

D300 for skyscape: same experience here :-) -十方水土- 给 十方水土 发送悄悄话 十方水土 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/07/2012 postreply 10:01:41

Maybe we should try dark frame substraction ? -十方水土- 给 十方水土 发送悄悄话 十方水土 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/07/2012 postreply 10:12:38

去DPR尼康D4-D800或佳能1D-5D3论坛找那个dark frame测试报告吧。上两周读到的 -U96- 给 U96 发送悄悄话 U96 的博客首页 (51 bytes) () 04/07/2012 postreply 10:16:31

Cool. Will check it out. -十方水土- 给 十方水土 发送悄悄话 十方水土 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/07/2012 postreply 10:23:26

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!