You miss the point,

It's not about whether he can replicate the shot or not, it is about whether it is appropriate to present the shot and take other people’s compliment for his creativity, without giving any credit to the photographer who originated the idea.

C80 had a very short comment, which I think represented my stance, and possibly others’.

@_@ deserves a lot of respect for his passion, his skills, his humor, and his contribution to this form. Personally I wish he comes back soon. But in this incident, he was wrong.

所有跟帖: 

You miss the point of this article -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (60 bytes) () 07/26/2010 postreply 09:42:34

The way you use @_@ to illustrate your point confused -吴聚- 给 吴聚 发送悄悄话 吴聚 的博客首页 (128 bytes) () 07/26/2010 postreply 09:50:12

It makes it easier to understand -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (175 bytes) () 07/26/2010 postreply 09:56:16

what does credit mean ?? -泉水- 给 泉水 发送悄悄话 泉水 的博客首页 (297 bytes) () 07/26/2010 postreply 09:56:16

像您这样编故事, -吴聚- 给 吴聚 发送悄悄话 吴聚 的博客首页 (66 bytes) () 07/26/2010 postreply 10:19:03

请不要转换话题。 -泉水- 给 泉水 发送悄悄话 泉水 的博客首页 (140 bytes) () 07/26/2010 postreply 10:30:10

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!