还是被一个投资者诉讼共产的。基本上是说，Fannie Mae2008年被Federal Housing Finance Agency （08年危机后成立的接管机构）接管以后，政府占着124B的资金（是分红还是什么不知道）不还给股东，股东诉讼政府，说FHFA领导结构不合宪法，因为领导（原任期五年）不能被现任总统替换。他们的目的是把整个机构都划为违宪，这样机构不存在了政府就必须把钱还给股东了。
最高法院同意他们的说法，说领导不能被现任总统替换确实违宪。但是后果不是把整个机构都判为违宪，而是仅仅是允许现任总统替换领导，机构本身还是合法的。结果本来川普的任命可以干五年(2019-2024)，现在却被拜登换上了一个左派领导。政府还是占着124B的资金不给股东。
现在左派领导上台，不但指示Fannie Mae调整LLPA，而且还搁置了Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac的私有化计划。所以，不幸的是Fannie/Freddie还要继续被共产下去。
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/06/collins-yellen-supreme-court-fhfa-backfire.html
In 2016, a group of wealthy investors hatched a lawsuit to dislodge $124 billion from the United States treasury and transfer a chunk of the money to their own pockets. The investors attacked the Federal Housing Finance Agency, a powerful executive agency that regulates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Their plan was to force a settlement that would enrich shareholders by transferring billions of dollars back to the mortgage giants and release them from government control.
It is difficult to overstate how badly this scheme backfired. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court affirmed the investors’ constitutional theory—then rejected their effort to claw back billions while deregulating the mortgage industry. In the process, they allowed President Joe Biden to appoint a new head of the FHFA, a progressive who will keep Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac funneling money to the government (instead of shareholders) indefinitely. The plaintiffs, in other words, did not just lose this case. They inadvertently defeated their ultimate objective, entrenching the very system they tried to topple.
