Secondly, why you explain the situation? Just say - no guilty. Then the policy has to prove that you are guilty.
回复:请教大家:我是被法官“仇视”了还是我自己敏感了?
Secondly, why you explain the situation? Just say - no guilty. Then the policy has to prove that you are guilty.
所有跟帖:
• 回复:回复:请教大家:我是被法官“仇视”了还是我自己敏感了? -單身老貓- ♂ (1576 bytes) () 04/19/2007 postreply 08:54:31
• 谢谢老猫码这么多字,现在心里有点底了 -flyfish118- ♀ (948 bytes) () 04/19/2007 postreply 09:31:38
• see 只要記得會用 "三克油"一定有用不是嗎 ? -單身老貓- ♂ (296 bytes) () 04/19/2007 postreply 09:54:33
• 你可真把我逗笑了, 我哪里是什么大喘气 -flyfish118- ♀ (100 bytes) () 04/19/2007 postreply 22:39:58
• GOOD,只要能讓您心情開心些,那就是好的! 祝您週末愉快 -單身老貓- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/20/2007 postreply 09:35:13
• 回复:回复:回复:请教大家:我是被法官“仇视”了还是我自己敏感了 -JXTiger- ♂ (213 bytes) () 04/19/2007 postreply 11:42:21
• 回复:回复:回复:回复:请教大家:我是被法官“仇视”了还是我自己 -單身老貓- ♂ (754 bytes) () 04/19/2007 postreply 15:00:19