Listening and Surveillance Devices Act 1972
http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/A/LISTENING%20AND%20SURVEILLANCE%20DEVICES%20ACT%201972/CURRENT/1972.112.UN.PDF
4—Regulation of use of listening devices
Except as provided by this Act, a person must not intentionally use any listening
device to overhear, record, monitor or listen to any private conversation, whether or
not the person is a party to the conversation, without the consent, express or implied,
of the parties to that conversation.
Maximum penalty: $10 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.
Australia, NO
所有跟帖:
•
谢谢!再问:
-牛鲜花妹妹-
♀
(480 bytes)
()
11/03/2014 postreply
12:30:25
•
我假设 澳大利亚法庭证据规则和英美区别不大
-lexm5-
♂
(501 bytes)
()
11/03/2014 postreply
12:43:37
•
我作为当事者亲属(车是我老公买的),我的话能作为证据么?
-牛鲜花妹妹-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/03/2014 postreply
13:07:16
•
亲眼看到,亲耳听到的,都是直接证据(direct evidence),可以出庭
-lexm5-
♂
(134 bytes)
()
11/03/2014 postreply
13:10:25
•
NND,我要是学法律的就好了。他们有律师团,已经开始耍阴谋了。
-牛鲜花妹妹-
♀
(93 bytes)
()
11/03/2014 postreply
13:20:03
•
你说那是录音整理,陪审团无法听录音,无法知道你有没有添油加醋,断章取义。
-lexm5-
♂
(96 bytes)
()
11/03/2014 postreply
13:25:10
•
找律师也需要我有足够的证据,让我想想该怎么办??? 再次谢谢您的帮助:)
-牛鲜花妹妹-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/03/2014 postreply
13:32:32
•
Your lawyer knows how to "Discover" evidence
-lexm5-
♂
(220 bytes)
()
11/03/2014 postreply
13:35:53