Does it mean that we have to back them up as well? Of course, for any single issue the interest of a group collectively may not always align with the interest of all the individuals within that group.
It's people's choice to commit suicide as well.
所有跟帖:
• I support CoolVoice goes to court. This is my only point. -LakeSideCA- ♂ (687 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 15:15:55
• I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -CoolVoice- ♂ (299 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 15:26:18
• 回复:I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -lhxlch- ♂ (41 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:02:48
• 回复:I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -單身老貓- ♂ (455 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:56:59
• 第一,中国人通常不愿意卷入这种纠纷,第二,我在被开除之前已经让他写下了 -CoolVoice- ♂ (259 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:15:11
• 回复:第一,中国人通常不愿意卷入这种纠纷,第二,我在被开除之前已经让他写下了 -單身老貓- ♂ (1340 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 22:23:38
• 法官取消了庭讯。所以我没有机会传唤对方出庭。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (576 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 05:19:07
• 如果政府起诉他们,我可否出庭作证?如果他们被定罪,我的案子能否Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:16:53
• 你当然要出庭作证,如果他们被定罪,我的案子必定会Reopen -chengdan88- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 14:15:02
• 我保留的emails和其它公司文件可以重现原来的工作进度,差不多可以精确到‘天’。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (2288 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:04:51
• 即使不能证明他们蓄意撒谎,但如果证明了他们撒谎,我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:09:21
• 回复:即使不能证明他们蓄意撒谎,但如果证明了他们撒谎,我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -宝石- ♀ (73 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 18:37:57
• 保留所有对方做伪证的证据,向FBI等等控告 -chengdan88- ♀ (1086 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 13:57:18