I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury,

just don't know should I report to District Attorney for crime, or I sue them myself for civil. I think once they are proved perjury, my case can be logically reopen, right? But one thing I am not sure: my former manager is living in CA. Where should I sue him? in Virginia, or in California?

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -lhxlch- ♂ (41 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:02:48

• 回复：I an actually thinking to sue Visa's witnesses perjury, -單身老貓- ♂ (455 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 18:56:59

• 第一，中国人通常不愿意卷入这种纠纷，第二，我在被开除之前已经让他写下了 -CoolVoice- ♂ (259 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:15:11

• 回复：第一，中国人通常不愿意卷入这种纠纷，第二，我在被开除之前已经让他写下了 -單身老貓- ♂ (1340 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 22:23:38

• 法官取消了庭讯。所以我没有机会传唤对方出庭。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (576 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 05:19:07

• 如果政府起诉他们，我可否出庭作证？如果他们被定罪，我的案子能否Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 19:16:53

• 你当然要出庭作证，如果他们被定罪，我的案子必定会Reopen -chengdan88- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 14:15:02

• 我保留的emails和其它公司文件可以重现原来的工作进度，差不多可以精确到‘天’。 -CoolVoice- ♂ (2288 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:04:51

• 即使不能证明他们蓄意撒谎，但如果证明了他们撒谎，我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -CoolVoice- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/28/2011 postreply 20:09:21

• 回复：即使不能证明他们蓄意撒谎，但如果证明了他们撒谎，我的案子是否可以 Reopen? -宝石- ♀ (73 bytes) () 03/29/2011 postreply 18:37:57

• 保留所有对方做伪证的证据，向FBI等等控告 -chengdan88- ♀ (1086 bytes) () 03/31/2011 postreply 13:57:18

• . -mbjr- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/13/2011 postreply 23:11:18