我查了下wiki的说法,和百度的说法倒是一致

 

Environmental impact of the coal industry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_the_coal_industry#Radiation_exposure


Radiation exposure[edit]

Coal also contains low levels of uraniumthorium, and other naturally occurring radioactive isotopes whose release into the environment may lead to radioactive contamination.[20][47] Coal plants emit radiation in the form of radioactive fly ash which is inhaled and ingested by neighbours, and incorporated into crops. A 1978 paper from Oak Ridge National Laboratory estimated that coal-fired power plants of that time may contribute a whole-body committed dose of 19 µSv/yr to their immediate neighbours in a 500 m radius.[48] The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation's 1988 report estimated the committed dose 1 km away to be 20 µSv/yr for older plants or 1µSv/yr for newer plants with improved fly ash capture, but was unable to confirm these numbers by test.[49] A single PWR spent fuel bundle, after 10 years cooldown, with no shielding, emits 2.3 MSv/yr, a trillion times more than coal.[50] However, if we exclude contained waste and ignore unintentional releases from nuclear plants, coal-plants carry more radioactive wastes into the environment than nuclear plants producing the same amount of energy. Plant-emitted radiation carried by coal-derived fly ash delivers 100 times more radiation to the surrounding environment than does the normal operation of a similarly productive nuclear plant.[51] This comparison does not consider the rest of the fuel cycle, i.e., coal and uranium mining and refining and waste disposal.




所有跟帖: 

你要注意人家的用此-may,以及if we exclude... -Sunnylian.- 给 Sunnylian. 发送悄悄话 (135 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:13:42

”甚至比火电站周围还要低“,也是不确定的说法吧 -人约黄昏后- 给 人约黄昏后 发送悄悄话 人约黄昏后 的博客首页 (153 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:21:48

”煤含有放射性元素“也基本上是个中性描述,并没有”一定会造成危害“的意思 -人约黄昏后- 给 人约黄昏后 发送悄悄话 人约黄昏后 的博客首页 (38 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:24:32

不是敏感不敏感的问题,而是要谨慎呀,同学 -Sunnylian.- 给 Sunnylian. 发送悄悄话 (226 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:29:29

笑,这么多资料都是相同观点,你还认为是‘信口开活” -人约黄昏后- 给 人约黄昏后 发送悄悄话 人约黄昏后 的博客首页 (323 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:36:39

科学界的观点? -Sunnylian.- 给 Sunnylian. 发送悄悄话 (108 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:40:04

死不认错?呵,百度/wiki里难道不是引述的科学研究的论文么 -人约黄昏后- 给 人约黄昏后 发送悄悄话 人约黄昏后 的博客首页 (92 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:45:15

好的,到此为止吧,我们没有必要为了老方再争论下去。话不投机半句多。 -Sunnylian.- 给 Sunnylian. 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:49:56

要话投机的应该去流坦,一个帖子万千赞 -人约黄昏后- 给 人约黄昏后 发送悄悄话 人约黄昏后 的博客首页 (26 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 21:36:15

英文的、剛剛的 -飯盛男- 给 飯盛男 发送悄悄话 飯盛男 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 23:19:57

co: -王翠花- 给 王翠花 发送悄悄话 王翠花 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/12/2014 postreply 00:58:38

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!