有I-140历史记录的人新签,续签,改签TN的问题,10几20年前就争吵过,当时的情形是100%拒签.后来,为纠正严厉执行之偏差

有I-140历史记录的人新签,续签,改签TN的问题,10几20年前就争吵过,当时的情形是100%拒签.后来,为纠正严厉执行之偏差,移民局发文,改为个案处理.

以楼主的案例,现在搞I-140实在是给自己改签TN添堵.除非改签时能拿得出很强的与加拿大的纽带关系来证明自己1:没有移民倾向,2:只有非移民倾向.

只要没有I-140记录在案,改签TN则高枕无忧.

"After considerable discussion between the Nebraska Service Center and AILA's NSC Liaison Committee, the NSC now indicates that the filing of an immigrant petition is simply one factor to consider in the adjudication of a TN extension, and should not automatically result in a denial. The NSC, which has exclusive jurisdiction over TN applications made on Form I-129, had previously indicated that NSC adjudicators were being told to deny TN applications if an I-140 immigrant petition has been filed on the individual's behalf. The basis of the denial had been that the individual no longer has nonimmigrant intent."
AILA InfoNet, “NSC Backs Off I-140/TN Policy Change” (posted on AILA InfoNet at Doc. No. 02111431 (Nov. 14, 2002).

"The fact that an alien is the beneficiary of an approved I-140 petition may not be, in and of itself, a reason to deny an application for admission, readmission, or extension of stay [under TN status] if the alien’s intent is to remain in the United States temporarily. Nevertheless, because the Service must evaluate each application on a case-by-case basis with regard to the alien’s intent, this factor may be taken into consideration along with other relevant factors every time that a TN nonimmigrant applies for admission, readmission or a new extension of stay. Therefore, while it is our opinion that a TN nonimmigrant may apply for readmission in the TN classification, if the inspecting officer determines that the individual has abandoned his or her temporary intent, that individual’s application for admission as a TN nonimmigrant may be refused."
Letter from Yvonne M. LaFleur, Chief, INS Business & Trade Services Branch
(posted on AILA InfoNet as “I-140 Filing Not Dispositive for TN” (June 18, 1996)).

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：有I-140历史记录的人新签,续签,改签TN的问题,10几20年前就争吵过,当时的情形是100%拒签.后来,为纠正严厉执行 -863211- ♂ (814 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 12:59:10

• 回复：回复：有I-140历史记录的人新签,续签,改签TN的问题,10几20年前就争吵过,当时的情形是100%拒签.后来,为纠正严 -863211- ♂ (308 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 14:23:01

• 说改签TN与I-140历史记录无关绝对是不对的.这里就有一个活生生的被拒签的实例,与楼主将要做的事很相似. -python2012- ♂ (1251 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 16:50:02

• 回复：说改签TN与I-140历史记录无关绝对是不对的.这里就有一个活生生的被拒签的实例,与楼主将要做的事很相似. -863211- ♂ (1867 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 17:47:03

• 在你的举例中,移民局是说对有I-140的,不可以把门全部关死,要留缝.并不是说要180度敞开. -python2012- ♂ (281 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 18:00:51

• 回复：在你的举例中,移民局是说对有I-140的,不可以把门全部关死,要留缝.并不是说要180度敞开. -863211- ♂ (725 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 18:58:39

• 2008年次贷危机导致许多人失业，错在美方，移民局网开一面，只要有解雇信，不追究I-140。 -python2012- ♂ (149 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 21:00:33

• 回复：2008年次贷危机导致许多人失业，错在美方，移民局网开一面，只要有解雇信，不追究I-140。 -863211- ♂ (622 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 21:28:18

• 不是我的推测，而是移民法在实践中的应用。 -python2012- ♂ (765 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 23:37:18

• 非常感谢两位对这个话题的讨论. 另有位网友dancerinbright也找到一个介绍, 从CN到GC的途径. -windwater1- ♂ (617 bytes) () 07/25/2014 postreply 12:48:04

• 读读这个： -快乐派对- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/21/2015 postreply 18:12:21