There are two (groups of) facts here.

The only fact matters to her is: Trump is not indicted.

The other facts do not matter to her.  These include: 

1. The wrongdoings of Trump and his campaign which have not rised to the level of criminal prosecution, such as lying about the Trump tower meeting and providing poll data to Russia etc.

2. The wrongdoings that exist but the intent cannot be proved in the absence of the state of mind in the obstruction case because, Mueller asked for but did not get to interview Trump.   

所有跟帖： 

• Just to illustrate the 2nd point using Barr's letter -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (796 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:25:36

• 几百页纸呢，选哪句话都可以大做文章，俺只关心最后结论是啥就行了 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:28:29

• "俺只关心最后结论是啥就行了"--This proves my point -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (199 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:30:35

• 是尊重结论，相信结论是根据facts的。难道您自己调查了吗？您哪里和她不同？ -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:33:29

• You just proved my 2nd point: 比如为什么没有为总统脱罪的事实 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (241 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:35:31

• 这是司法部长的四页纸结论的一部分； 要再浓缩一下： -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (83 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:33:23

• 所以主观的人抓住哪句话都可以做文章的但不是结论。橘子是橘子，香蕉是香蕉 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:38:58

• 穆勒没有为总统脱罪：这是结论。 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:42:27

• 罪，定义一下，不能结论矛盾 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:43:54

• “it also does not exonerate him.“ -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:46:57

• 该清楚得清楚，靠模糊来误导不好 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:49:08

• According to COURT FILING: Manafort shared polling data with Rus -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (448 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:28:56

• 穆勒两年调查结论没有collusion。 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:37:16

• 穆勒按照国会给的任务：1。 俄罗斯干预大选--证实。 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (154 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:41:11

• go punch sand -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:50:29