one needs to differentiate facts vs. opinions

Fact is fact, it does not change whether you like it or not

everyone is entitled to his or her opinions 

 

所有跟帖： 

• There are two (groups of) facts here. -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (568 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:17:16

• Just to illustrate the 2nd point using Barr's letter -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (796 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:25:36

• 几百页纸呢，选哪句话都可以大做文章，俺只关心最后结论是啥就行了 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:28:29

• "俺只关心最后结论是啥就行了"--This proves my point -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (199 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:30:35

• 是尊重结论，相信结论是根据facts的。难道您自己调查了吗？您哪里和她不同？ -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:33:29

• You just proved my 2nd point: 比如为什么没有为总统脱罪的事实 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (241 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:35:31

• 这是司法部长的四页纸结论的一部分； 要再浓缩一下： -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (83 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:33:23

• 所以主观的人抓住哪句话都可以做文章的但不是结论。橘子是橘子，香蕉是香蕉 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:38:58

• 穆勒没有为总统脱罪：这是结论。 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:42:27

• 罪，定义一下，不能结论矛盾 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:43:54

• “it also does not exonerate him.“ -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:46:57

• 该清楚得清楚，靠模糊来误导不好 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:49:08

• According to COURT FILING: Manafort shared polling data with Rus -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (448 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:28:56

• 穆勒两年调查结论没有collusion。 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:37:16

• 穆勒按照国会给的任务：1。 俄罗斯干预大选--证实。 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (154 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:41:11

• go punch sand -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:50:29

• 对的 -Sarsar- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:21:13