Just to illustrate the 2nd point using Barr's letter

来源: SwiperTheFox 2019-03-29 13:25:36 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (796 bytes)

"the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

The reason that Trump was not indicted for obstrution of justice was because the difficulty of assessing his state of mind.

所有跟帖: 

几百页纸呢,选哪句话都可以大做文章,俺只关心最后结论是啥就行了 -Sarsar- 给 Sarsar 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:28:29

"俺只关心最后结论是啥就行了"--This proves my point -SwiperTheFox- 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (199 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:30:35

是尊重结论,相信结论是根据facts的。难道您自己调查了吗?您哪里和她不同? -Sarsar- 给 Sarsar 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:33:29

You just proved my 2nd point: 比如为什么没有为总统脱罪的事实 -SwiperTheFox- 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (241 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:35:31

这是司法部长的四页纸结论的一部分; 要再浓缩一下: -SwiperTheFox- 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (83 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:33:23

所以主观的人抓住哪句话都可以做文章的但不是结论。橘子是橘子,香蕉是香蕉 -Sarsar- 给 Sarsar 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:38:58

穆勒没有为总统脱罪:这是结论。 -SwiperTheFox- 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:42:27

罪,定义一下,不能结论矛盾 -Sarsar- 给 Sarsar 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:43:54

“it also does not exonerate him.“ -SwiperTheFox- 给 SwiperTheFox 发送悄悄话 SwiperTheFox 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:46:57

该清楚得清楚,靠模糊来误导不好 -Sarsar- 给 Sarsar 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/29/2019 postreply 13:49:08

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!