我前貼的解釋有些問題。事情沒有那么復雜。比較簡單的解釋是當加速板被踏下時,ECM不會理會剎車板被踏下。
造成致命車禍的情形可能是如下。駕駛因為某種原因加速,然后他將腳放松,但加速板卡住,車子因此繼續加速,這時他踩剎車ECM也不理會,最后車子失控。
修正我的煞車門解釋
所有跟帖:
•
如果这样,是不是ECM也应该recall呢?
-UberAlles-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
10:54:34
•
Look at what an American user said on a follow -up comments
-internuts-
♂
(534 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
11:07:39
•
回复:Look at what an American user said on a follow -up comments
-tsc12-
♂
(167 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
11:17:53
•
if 加速板卡住, it'll keep the speed (on flat road), not to accelate
-internuts-
♂
(134 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
11:24:40
•
回复:if 加速板卡住, it'll keep the speed (on flat road), not to accelat
-tsc12-
♂
(578 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
11:34:25
•
回复:回复:if 加速板卡住, it'll keep the speed (on flat road), not to acce
-tsc12-
♂
(306 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
11:42:39
•
Of course Windows is buggy! No virus for Linux.
-UberAlles-
♂
(1248 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
12:14:28
•
回复:Of course Windows is buggy! No virus for Linux.
-tsc12-
♂
(513 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
12:45:05
•
I knew what you meant. This is called "brake fade".
-UberAlles-
♂
(855 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
13:24:04
•
回复:I knew what you meant. This is called "brake fade".
-tsc12-
♂
(251 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
14:47:31
•
如果刹车会被override,一定是bug了。
-UberAlles-
♂
(209 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
11:27:48
•
回复:如果刹车会被override,一定是bug了。
-tsc12-
♂
(71 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
11:38:01
•
If the throttle is fully open, there won't be any brake
-TYM-
♀
(452 bytes)
()
02/02/2010 postreply
11:20:23
•
toyota needs a $1 override which called smart brake
-drivy-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
02/01/2010 postreply
13:47:25