CDC eviction moratorium

This order is to be published on 9/4/2020, this is the advanced copy.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-19654.pdf

Covers renters with income less than $99K (single) or $198K (joint) until 12/31/2020.  

I think this order is BS.  Because if the goal is to stop spreading the virus, why only stop eviction for income less than 99K/198K?  Are rich tenants less contagious than poor tenants?  

It's likely a landlord would be able to challenge that CDC exceeded its statutory authority to issue such order.  I think a blanket ban on eviction regardless income would be more likely to be held up in court. 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 美国是联邦制，CDC即使发出指令也需要各州首长据此分别做出决定吧。 -borisg- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/02/2020 postreply 22:03:14

• preemption是一个很复杂的概念 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (920 bytes) () 09/02/2020 postreply 22:39:15

• 理伯儒們最擁戴的O8是史上最濫用EO的總統伐。。 -chent12- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/02/2020 postreply 22:56:00

• DACA的EO到现在也没有被推翻，用EO就要会用，不要有漏洞。 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (1208 bytes) () 09/02/2020 postreply 23:34:35

• 其實具備邏輯很重要。。要探討這個到別的壇 -chent12- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/02/2020 postreply 23:39:00

• 你为什么总是用繁体？ -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (119 bytes) () 09/02/2020 postreply 23:49:55

• 你先跑题谈O8的，别人讨论的还是相关的 -pangpangxiongxiong- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2020 postreply 05:54:01

• 某些人的逻辑就是，我做错事不要紧，因为别人也做错事。 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2020 postreply 08:08:10

• 大哥你看清楚再發言好嗎？賴蒙在前一個貼說和黨很多EO嘰嘰歪歪所以才提到前任的EO，別無聊了行嗎 -chent12- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2020 postreply 09:46:00

• 人家整个贴是有相关内容值得看了，人家也没要求你去别的坛 -pangpangxiongxiong- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2020 postreply 11:00:57

• 你应该有看到赖蒙前面举DACA的EO这个例子和里面的关于老川其他EO的链接对伐, -chent12- ♂ (260 bytes) () 09/03/2020 postreply 12:46:14

• 川普政府责成CDC搞的这个怪怪的，年收入$99,000夫妻$198,000在很多地方已经是高收入了。 -pangpangxiongxiong- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2020 postreply 05:48:03

• 加州那个明确了只保护受COVID-19 影响的租客，比较合理 -pangpangxiongxiong- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2020 postreply 05:56:37

• whatever u do u & stop acting like u know everything coz u don't -chent12- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2020 postreply 09:48:00