judging improvement or not is by using same standard

08 lower the unemployment rate from almost 10% to under 5% in 8 years by using the same standard that Bush years was using. If Trump changes the standards now, he has to use the same standard to judge his own results. so there is no real advantage in switching standards, is there?

所有跟帖： 

• 那大家得先接受一个事实，就是美国的失业率不是“那么低”，然后再看哪种统计方式对川普有利。 -尽量少折腾- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/10/2016 postreply 07:54:16

• 96年，格林斯潘曾用“虚假的繁荣”来描绘当时的情况，现在看，那时候的大环境比现在是天上地下 -尽量少折腾- ♂ (59 bytes) () 11/10/2016 postreply 08:02:06

• 摆弄数据目的对川普有利，还是对美国有利？不要把目的搞混 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/10/2016 postreply 08:16:19

• 当然目的是要对川普有利。指望对美国有利，那就犯了幼稚病了。难道忘记了奥巴马首次竞选时群情激奋的情景了？ -尽量少折腾- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/10/2016 postreply 08:29:45

• who cares what's best for Trump? I don't know what you -gqc- ♀ (28 bytes) () 11/10/2016 postreply 16:53:32

• 你不知道，很正常啊。网络上什么类型的人没有啊？ -尽量少折腾- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/10/2016 postreply 19:11:30