Nonsense123: 读读这个Tax Court的案例

http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/TrzeciakMemo.TCM.WPD.pdf

所有跟帖： 

• 顶。很有价值一读。 -古石- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 13:45:20

• 先谢过。晚上再看。：） -Nonsense123- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 14:52:45

• this is so long. -jjj7- ♂ (28 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 15:22:20

• Hope somebody can provide a highlight version in Chinese. -古石- ♂ (127 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 15:39:00

• sum up in 4 words. -jy101- ♂ (30 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 15:41:01

• 就是要按irs规矩办事儿。不能乱抵减。哈哈。我最守法的一位。 -Nonsense123- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 15:57:28

• 好没有天理啊，管十几个房子还不能算工作750个以上小时，难道只有REALTOR才 -jingke- ♀ (462 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 16:46:21

• few main points from reading. -jy101- ♂ (357 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 16:51:21

• good point. Thanks. -SunshineInCA- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 18:00:21

• 谢谢！俺真没时间去读那么长的东西。 -小心翼翼的小地主- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 18:50:15

• who won? -laoyangdelp- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 17:38:46

• Just skim through it. I thought IRS won, but I could be wrong -naive2- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 18:29:33

• Thanks. Now we at least have a bench mark -laoyangdelp- ♀ (69 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 20:12:48

• No, what a hell one claims over 130K and over 150K loss. -naive2- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/18/2012 postreply 20:57:56

• My take is to reduce the red flags, also claim the reasonable am -handy2011- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/19/2012 postreply 09:35:38

• This case has nothing to do with rental deductions -LaoWong- ♀ (867 bytes) () 04/19/2012 postreply 15:48:38

• thx for putting in the last piece of missing puzzle. -日月茗- ♀ (50 bytes) () 04/19/2012 postreply 22:10:42

• the settlements were specified -commonsense888- ♀ (816 bytes) () 04/19/2012 postreply 22:37:20

• Good catch I know I skipped some -LaoWong- ♀ (44 bytes) () 04/20/2012 postreply 13:45:32