then what's the criteria for "good" photo?

来源: 江北快炒 2011-10-21 09:55:13 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (886 bytes)
回答: 关于置顶,也乱说几句个人看法河神2011-10-21 07:09:39

Personally I admire "organic" art, which means no PS, no artificial light, just a precious moment, it can tell a moving story or a beautiful scene. But in the reality, it's very difficult.

Like me, I like portrait a lot,  but to get a better state, I have to manipulate the light. I tried my best not to rely on PS, set right flash and position, lay out composition in camera. But still, some minor crap or modification are still needed. Fewer people here talk about how to manipulate light. I joined and so far they seems not resisit it.

I think, back to my point, find the best way for your interest, stick to it, work hard on it, produce eye attracting photo, and enjoy it... Good photos do not have hard coded criteria. Even the thread is not top, that's fine too. Somebody like your style will comment, appraise, or critique, even contact you.

所有跟帖: 

applause. well said! -笑笑01- 给 笑笑01 发送悄悄话 笑笑01 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/21/2011 postreply 16:17:28

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”