回复:这算不算劳动剥削?美国有什么样的法律管这样的事?

来源: why-why 2006-10-27 17:11:02 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (408 bytes)
I am pretty sure that you have withheld information on the relationship/agreement b/w A and B. If the situation is as you said, B serviced the gov. agency, gov. agency still owe B's fee. B should go after the gov. agency because they paid the wrong person, and let gov. agency to go after A.

There is no claim between A and B unless, of course, there are something else you did not say in your post.

所有跟帖: 

回复:回复:这算不算劳动剥削?美国有什么样的法律管这样的事? -whywhy???- 给 whywhy??? 发送悄悄话 (322 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:19:44

A is not the employer of B. -whywhy???- 给 whywhy??? 发送悄悄话 (123 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:31:07

回复:A is not the employer of B. -whywhy???- 给 whywhy??? 发送悄悄话 (151 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:35:01

回复:回复:回复:这算不算劳动剥削?美国有什么样的法律管这样的事 -why-why- 给 why-why 发送悄悄话 why-why 的博客首页 (750 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 17:38:09

回复:回复:回复:回复:这算不算劳动剥削?美国有什么样的法律管这 -whywhy???- 给 whywhy??? 发送悄悄话 (449 bytes) () 10/27/2006 postreply 18:52:32

回复:回复:回复:回复:回复:这算不算劳动剥削?美国有什么样的法 -why-why- 给 why-why 发送悄悄话 why-why 的博客首页 (254 bytes) () 10/28/2006 postreply 12:30:56

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”