Regarding 4), whether property management is considered...

来源: BR33ZY 于 2017-12-01 08:42:18 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (281 bytes)
本帖于 2017-12-01 08:43:28 时间, 由普通用户 BR33ZY 编辑
回答: 参院税改方案对地主有何影响？ 由 gccard 于 2017-12-01 07:21:13

Regarding 4), whether property management is considered "personal services" (i.e. health, law, accounting, etc) is debatable. The bottom line is, you don't get to save much from QBI deduction even if you qualify, because it phases out rather quickly. 

所有跟帖： 

• It only phases out after $500,000. Not many here make that much -gccard- ♀ 给 gccard 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2017 postreply 10:12:58

• https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/11.9.17%20Chairman' -BR33ZY- ♂ 给 BR33ZY 发送悄悄话 BR33ZY 的博客首页 (212 bytes) () 12/01/2017 postreply 11:22:01

• 谢谢。不过这文件应该已经太旧了。我今天读的phase out是五十万，不是十五万 -gccard- ♀ 给 gccard 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2017 postreply 13:26:11

• 这东西每小时都在变的。既是参院通过，众院也可能改 -gccard- ♀ 给 gccard 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2017 postreply 13:29:37

• 这里每年有$50万管理费估计屈指可数。老朽，田鼠也许有 -gccard- ♀ 给 gccard 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2017 postreply 10:24:19

• 这个的确，不过地产管理能不能算，这个是最主要的问题 -BR33ZY- ♂ 给 BR33ZY 发送悄悄话 BR33ZY 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/01/2017 postreply 11:24:36

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！