Wrong, as a parent I've gone through college admission.

My child didn't go to IVYs, and a student (socially and economically disadvantaged chinese boy) whom my child tutored went to Harvard.

As matter of fact, my conclusion is that in general, girls and Asians have advantages in current selection system of top college admission which is heavily based on GPA.

The fact that many high stats asian students couldn't make to top univ. is not the results of specific discrimination against asians, rather it's the result of balance in all aspects.

所有跟帖： 

• I can't agree more. -6degrees- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 19:43:09

• 那你怎么解释好大学限制亚裔招生比例？那么多好学生，不管怎么好都不能超过这个比例？ -爱春- ♀ (102 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 19:57:14

• Unlike public schools which bear more social responsilibity to -blackmatter- ♀ (971 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 20:42:51

• well said. 本来理性和平的争论这个问题都是可以的。可怕的是一上来就说你的孩子可以去Cal State和黑墨挤啊 -黄玫瑰888- ♀ (111 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 19:59:07

• 其實我覺得人家沒有說你孩子怎麼樣，只是舉個例說讓你設身處地的想想這個問題而已，你也要理性一點。 -超級良民- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 20:12:00

• 看看你怎么说吧？"我自己也希望校园多元化。像UCLA，Berkeley这样亚裔占了一半的学校就是华人家长和孩子也不太愿意去了。" -飞*星- ♂ (522 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 20:35:34

• 这里讨论的教育话题都是关乎自己的切身利益。要你 put your money where your mouth is就可以看出你 -飞*星- ♂ (24 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 20:41:45

• 其實你說的是一樣的事情，只是好聽的說法叫balance，不好聽的說法叫歧視，可是不好聽的往往就是truth因為truth alw -超級良民- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 20:05:59

• 因為truth always hurts -超級良民- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/04/2015 postreply 20:14:35

• 拿种族作为balance中的一项，不就是种族歧视吗？ -touji- ♂ (67 bytes) () 01/05/2015 postreply 00:00:14