Unlike public schools which bear more social responsilibity to

来源: blackmatter 2015-01-04 20:42:51 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (971 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ blackmatter ] 在 2015-01-04 20:49:34 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
applicant's population in their admission policy for obvious reasons, generally private schools have more liberty in their admission policy for their own interests, which may not be in the best interest of specific racial group. Who says life is fair?

If you ever got chance to read a rejection letter from a top school admission office to a top quality applicant, it would most likely says something like "the school is honored to have student with such high quality to apply, and the student is well qualified and any top school will be happy to have him/her. However, this year the school can't offer admission because the student don't FIT the school's needs. Some schools would even go further say that it's their loss.... The reason that i point out this is that the top schools never say these top students are not qualified, they deny these applications for other reasons, and they have liberty to do that.


请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”