这是比较标准的离婚协议,想知道一般的理解是怎样的?我的理解是如果是individual eastate,当然是be a first charge against the assets。但如果不是individual eastate, "a claim shall exist against his estate"这句话又如何?
老猫,第二段的第二句是:a claim shall exist against his estate
这是比较标准的离婚协议,想知道一般的理解是怎样的?我的理解是如果是individual eastate,当然是be a first charge against the assets。但如果不是individual eastate, "a claim shall exist against his estate"这句话又如何?
所有跟帖:
• 回复:老猫,第二段的第二句是:a claim shall exist against his es -單身老貓- ♂ (220 bytes) () 07/31/2006 postreply 09:06:14
• 很明白了。非常感谢 -happylittlewoman- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2006 postreply 09:45:21