Thanks, borisg. The two PM contracts look very similar. The PMs

来源: Bigcat 于 2015-02-04 07:22:02 [档案] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (329 bytes)

本帖于 2015-02-04 07:24:51 时间, 由普通用户 Bigcat 编辑

回答: Lease is with property owner. PM serves as agent of owner. Agent 由 borisg 于 2015-02-04 07:11:37

will be responsible for leasing, managing, and collecting rentals. I will pay them fees. The definition looks same in both scenarios, but the logical is totally different. I think I take more risks in the second scenario. What should I pay attention to? The tenant will give me more trouble because I am a long distance landlord.

您的位置：文学城 » 论坛 » 投资理财 » Thanks, borisg. The two PM contracts look very similar. The PMs

所有跟帖：

• it is your risk either way -njrookie- ♂ (63 bytes) () 02/04/2015 postreply 07:28:23

• The PM promises to collect rental for me in the PM contract. -Bigcat- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/04/2015 postreply 07:32:02

• it is just that, a promise -njrookie- ♂ (76 bytes) () 02/04/2015 postreply 08:00:44

• I will have more risk and more power in the second scenario. I w -Bigcat- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/04/2015 postreply 08:05:55

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！