strategy and union

来源: catluck2 2014-07-20 06:31:40 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1803 bytes)
回答: 冯仑:在纽约投资地产有三种模式数据有道2014-07-16 21:50:07
On investment strategy:
For the condo project in San Francisco, Vanke partners with Tishman Speyer and owns more than 70% of the entity. But unlike typical US money investor, Vanke is very quiet, not involved in any financing negotiation at all. Not sure about Vanke’s plan. Maybe they focus on yield, not training their own team at this time. Hope their team can be more active in the Lexington Avenue deal.
Impressed when heard Greenland chose to work by itself instead of finding a local partner although they do have Tishman (not Tishman Speyer) as the construction manager. No experiences with Greenland, but heard the project is going well. Recently, they received $39MM TOT reimbursement from city of Los Angeles.

On the union:
It is difficult to avoid union issue because Chinese developers are still focus on the “Big Six” (SF, NY, LA, Chicago, Boston, and Washington DC). Union is strong in these big cities. It will be much easier to find non-union in Southwest, like Texas.
Most Chinese developers work on Trophy project (high rise, institutional quality) that could only be built by union. For elevator, crane, etc, there is almost no non-union contractor.
Although union is a little expensive, typical they do a better quality job; they could be a market tool; they could help the entitlement process; help financing, especially some lenders in US require 100% union for the construction job, most of these funds are funded by union pension money.

Green building and LEED:
LEED is still voluntary, but sooner or later, LEED will be mandatory just like ADA requirements. It is better to do it right now than spending money later.




请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”