五百万＋ 在美国，算 top 1％ 富有

Following four years of steady increases, the number of United States households in most wealth segments reached record highs, and all wealth segments saw large increases from 2012 to 2013. Mass Affluent Households, with a net worth between $100,000 and $1 million, Not Including Primary Residence (NIPR), grew to 28.97 million. This is an increase of 500,000 investors over 2012, and 3.77 million over the post-recession low of 25.2 million.

Millionaire Households with a net worth between $1 million and $5 million reached 8.39 million, an increase of 440,000 investors since 2012 and an increase of 2.53 million investors since the 2008 dip, when there were only 5.86 million Millionaires. The number of Millionaires has been slowly increasing since 2008.

The record-high stock market has played a large role in the return of Millionaires, as well as a return to previous numbers in other wealth segments as well.

The growth is similar in the Ultra High Net Worth segment. The number of households with a net worth between $5 million and $25 million reached 1.108 million in the U.S., an increase of 85,000 since 2012 and an increase of 352,000 since 2008.

Among the wealthiest Americans, there were 132,000 households with a net worth of $25 million or more in 2013, an increase of 15,000 from 2012, which was close to 10 percent. In 2008, there were only 84,000 investors with a net worth of $25 million or more, meaning there has been an increase of 48,000 since 2008.

http://spectrem.com/Content/Millionaire-Households-Back-to-Pre-Recession-Levels.aspx

所有跟帖： 

• 这里不包括我在内随便找一个人就有五百万 -9876543- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:01:59

• 回复：这里不包括我在内随便找一个人就有五百万 -猛狮- ♂ (30 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:03:51

• 往下看就知道了，再加个零也有。 -9876543- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:04:58

• 回复：往下看就知道了，再加个零也有。 -猛狮- ♂ (31 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:12:52

• 你是说有五千万都不配在这里bso? -9876543- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:13:57

• 回复：你是说有五千万都不配在这里bso? -猛狮- ♂ (32 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:14:41

• 也许退休了，实在无聊呢 -liushui2007- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:15:32

• LOL，谁知道呢？ -9876543- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:15:58

• 楼上二位，信总比不信好。至少还有一个希望。。。 -猛狮- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:25:23

• 呵呵，俺一直都信啊，LOL... -9876543- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:27:44

• 我就有五百万(日元） -小孩妈- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:36:09

• 和我比是富人 -9876543- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 16:38:25

• 还有更富的，莫桑比克元，个个都是亿万富翁。 -trimtip- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:46:17

• 这里的五百万是不含自住房的净资产，不是资产，在这个班上应该还是不多 -laborlaw- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:09:50

• 这些有钱人是几代或者几十年积累下来的，这里人也就积累一二十年 -laborlaw- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:11:26

• 这里的500万应该是包括自住屋里的净值，不算也没啥意思，只要把自住屋出租自己住到apt，不就变投资净值了？ -trimtip- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:42:59

• 不过，靠吃咸菜省下家财万贯也没什么意思 -laborlaw- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 18:51:08

• 吹牛吧 -DoraDora2008- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 22:43:45

• 我只刷卡，口袋里沒钱。没钱银一个。 -firefly2000 - ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:01:27

• Does it include retirement accounts? -LAChinese- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:18:30

• LOL,小猪储蓄罐里的也要算啊！ -9876543- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:22:41

• I know a few with a couple of millions there. -LAChinese- ♂ (16 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:25:33

• 老大，好久没见去那里啦？ 对老大，5M现金那不是小意思。。赫赫 -FL棉农- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 17:31:20

• 都是成人了，在这抖搂钱，真是俗不可耐。 -faday- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 18:25:50

• 这里本来就是俗不可耐版，满版都是钱钱钱！ -laborlaw- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 18:52:13

• $1.5M 在美国，算 top 1％ 富有! -gccard- ♀ (229 bytes) () 03/14/2014 postreply 19:49:46