that is your statements, not necessarily facts.

来源: pediatrician2 于 2012-12-19 11:35:33 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (152 bytes)
本帖于 2012-12-19 14:17:35 时间, 由普通用户 jy101 编辑
回答: well said... 由 noconfusion 于 2012-12-19 11:32:32

does your conclusion come from rigrous research? give me break. you are boasting here others are chicken heads. shame on you.

 

所有跟帖： 

• ask my friend google -noconfusion- ♂ 给 noconfusion 发送悄悄话 noconfusion 的博客首页 (163 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 11:39:07

• i do not even bother wasting time on your fact. -pediatrician2- ♂ 给 pediatrician2 发送悄悄话 pediatrician2 的博客首页 (87 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 11:50:47

• what rigorous? -noconfusion- ♂ 给 noconfusion 发送悄悄话 noconfusion 的博客首页 (411 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 12:02:58

• what rigorous? -noconfusion- ♂ 给 noconfusion 发送悄悄话 noconfusion 的博客首页 (411 bytes) () 12/19/2012 postreply 12:03:01

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！