Agree but, I have a question.

Personally I don't need much. But how about the people you still care about: young kids, old parents... when they need something?

Love, sure you could give. Whether get that back or not, make it seperate because you/we are already willing to give.

Fair and justice, what can you do about it? If you are not powerful enough to make some positive difference, what's the meaning of life? So, are you in, or are you out?

所有跟帖： 

• Our kids would definitely have a better life even we pass 0 to t -naive2- ♀ (94 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:18:10

• 无法肯定我们的孩子一定比我们幸福。 -mom2013- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:24:04

• 同样的困惑：无法肯定我们的孩子一定比我们幸福。 -螺丝螺帽- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:26:39

• 两点不容置疑 -美西游子- ♀ (134 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 12:31:10

• 即使那样，也于物质关系不大。 -Naive2- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:28:50

• 这也正是我的问题：家庭院责任和社会责任限制了个人的精神上的自由，lz一定是powerful enough -08明前茶- ♀ (28 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:20:14

• 自由是相对的。没有责任和限制，何来自由？有的话，也常常是懒散和自我陶醉。 -HappyWed- ♀ (53 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:31:31

• mm的相对论很好呀。非常辩证呀。 -zj071- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:34:16

• 回复：mm的相对论很好呀。非常辩证呀。 -08明前茶- ♀ (42 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:39:34

• 这两天没来这里。刚刚看到。谢谢了。我差不多下个星期过户了。 -zj071- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:41:56

• 呵呵，我讲的是精神上的自由，你讲的是行动上的自由 -08明前茶- ♀ (67 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:52:07

• 呵呵，精神上，每个人都是自由的。 -HappyWed- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:55:06

• 哈哈。我们肤浅。凡人。 -zj071- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 11:56:41

• 这是个哲学问题 -WQPY- ♂ (934 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 12:40:02

• Agree! -08明前茶- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/03/2012 postreply 12:43:31