Not really?

来源: wooddiy 于 2012-07-23 14:05:05 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (1803 bytes)
回答: 美国有些法律对于房东来说是BS 由 backchina888 于 2012-07-23 13:50:44

 

1、下雪天，房客不小心在出租房处摔倒，房东甚至要负责任: umbrella? Not really either.
2、房客不交房租，房东自己无权直接赶人: of course not. Landlord is not authorized to live during lease.
3、走法律程序，费时1~5个月(视不同州而异)而不顾房东的得失: ask TT, especially JY101's "bible".
4、Eviction后期房客自己搬走，顺手牵羊把房东的财物搬走或蓄意毁坏财物，房东财产难以得到有效保护 Read JY101's Bible!
5、 Eviction等到set out那一天，要自己请人把房客的东西搬出去，且要小心看管好并避免雨淋 Really? Read JY101's Bible!!
6、水费（前owener的或租客的）永远与当前房东有关（也许不同州有异）: probably not. Why the previous owner's?
7、房产税往往高与房子价值计算、每年上涨、不管是否有人住: Of course this is the correct way.
Your examples are not enough to show SB or BS.

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• But those examples are common sense, -backchina888- ♂ 给 backchina888 发送悄悄话 backchina888 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/23/2012 postreply 14:08:53

• where is JY101's Bible?? thanks -HappyWed- ♀ 给 HappyWed 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/23/2012 postreply 14:21:16

• JY's bible to eviction............. 2008-07-17 19:09:01 -wooddiy- ♂ 给 wooddiy 发送悄悄话 wooddiy 的博客首页 (1671 bytes) () 07/23/2012 postreply 14:27:06

• 说的容易，实施起来难。首先要能找到他人去哪里了，否则法庭传票没地方送 -说的好- ♀ 给 说的好 发送悄悄话 (137 bytes) () 07/23/2012 postreply 16:55:20

• 对了，这就是政府保护弱者造成的结果。 -backchina888- ♂ 给 backchina888 发送悄悄话 backchina888 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/23/2012 postreply 18:30:41

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！