That kind of business model is: winer takes all.

For every niche, there would be only 1 winer makes money, 1 survivor hanging above break even line, 1 slightly below water wishfully thinking... everybody's else dead already. You have to run for the speed first.

Each story can't last long either, like the Groupon / Living Social, WebEx / GoToMeeting, My Space / FB / Monster...

Good thing about segmented business, like landlord here as a good example, it's easier for people to start and last longer. 小而碎也有好处,大鳄也不容易整合。要是没有那实力,就不能处于四战之地。

所有跟帖: 

有道理 -08明前茶- 给 08明前茶 发送悄悄话 08明前茶 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 13:19:26

Ding -向大洋- 给 向大洋 发送悄悄话 向大洋 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 13:51:24

It's not necessary -如川- 给 如川 发送悄悄话 (334 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 13:51:41

It market is accessible universally. Different from fast food. -向大洋- 给 向大洋 发送悄悄话 向大洋 的博客首页 (80 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 14:00:51

I meant "IT" market, not "It market"... -向大洋- 给 向大洋 发送悄悄话 向大洋 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 14:07:27

Every market has the potential -如川- 给 如川 发送悄悄话 (266 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 14:29:46

agree! even in the traditional business like cosmetic products -jessefan- 给 jessefan 发送悄悄话 (169 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 14:17:09

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!