我一直用 HR Block 软件报税,本次惊讶发现,当我欲再加一个上大学的孩子,以便降低缴税额时,其税额一分钱都不变;一番研究后发现,虽1个孩子和2个,3个税额没有区别,但随着孩子的数量增加,AMT相应增加。故此认为,家庭收入高于20多万(taxable income)的,似乎孩子生的再多,也得不到人头的免税额。 不知这是软件故障,还是IRS的设计。希望有税务专家给与核实。谢谢。
请教税务专家:AMT将孩子也吃掉了?
所有跟帖:
•
没错!
-美西游子-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
11:17:22
•
是IRS的设计
-SR99-
♀
(108 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
11:18:27
•
明白了,谢谢解答。
-tnbna-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
11:21:24
•
IRS will refund the previous AMT to you during the no AMT year
-逍遥流云-
♀
(115 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
12:04:35
•
Is this true? never heard of it.More details please.
-SR99-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
13:35:53
•
I don't think so
-laoyangdelp-
♀
(387 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
15:51:24
•
Sure. Only time based AMT can be claimed back using 8801
-逍遥流云-
♀
(128 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
17:17:30
•
most people here hit regular AMT not time-based AMT
-laoyangdelp-
♀
(60 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
19:49:14
•
More kids means more happiness
-wooddiy-
♂
(62 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
12:52:42
•
是滴。感谢真主IRS。
-jin_yin_hua-
♂
(49 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
13:38:29
•
not really
-zbj8888-
♂
(411 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
15:24:49
•
same in TurboTax
-zbj8888-
♂
(269 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
13:41:54
•
again, student has to support
-美西游子-
♀
(157 bytes)
()
04/17/2012 postreply
16:09:43
•
是,我们每年都有AMT, taxable income多于22万的,什么也减不了,包括孩子的学费,退休金,等等。。。
-北美牡丹-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/18/2012 postreply
17:59:28