they will have less incentive to move out more

来源: 秋色满院 2011-11-02 17:53:16 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (267 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 秋色满院 ] 在 2011-11-03 15:16:07 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

because of the associated cost and risk for moving money around. all the tax shelter things would be unecessary. Tax Shelters are not 100% safe, you may lose control of your own money. People may be paying more than 9% of their dole in keeping them safe. 

所有跟帖: 

0% vs. 9%, think again. -jy101- 给 jy101 发送悄悄话 jy101 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/02/2011 postreply 18:06:26

some rich people are paying 10%-15% service fee -秋色满院- 给 秋色满院 发送悄悄话 秋色满院 的博客首页 (49 bytes) () 11/02/2011 postreply 18:14:59

when there is a will, there is a way. -jy101- 给 jy101 发送悄悄话 jy101 的博客首页 (137 bytes) () 11/02/2011 postreply 18:36:52

not paying tax does not mean they are not paying cost -秋色满院- 给 秋色满院 发送悄悄话 秋色满院 的博客首页 (195 bytes) () 11/02/2011 postreply 18:56:11

haha, if there only 9% tax, someone will do it for 5%.. -jy101- 给 jy101 发送悄悄话 jy101 的博客首页 (69 bytes) () 11/02/2011 postreply 19:06:44

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”