well, electricity is cheaper than fussil fuel, everything includ

来源: longterminvestor 于 2011-07-01 15:41:18 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (13 bytes)

所有跟帖： 

• depends。currently most eletricity is from fossil fuel. -sweetptt- ♂ 给 sweetptt 发送悄悄话 sweetptt 的博客首页 (220 bytes) () 07/01/2011 postreply 15:48:59

• I should have said oil instead of fussil fuel -longterminvestor- ♂ 给 longterminvestor 发送悄悄话 longterminvestor 的博客首页 (624 bytes) () 07/01/2011 postreply 15:55:56

• depends on the energy convert efficiency -wxc1894- ♀ 给 wxc1894 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2011 postreply 15:49:45

• did I say everything included/considered? -longterminvestor- ♂ 给 longterminvestor 发送悄悄话 longterminvestor 的博客首页 (50 bytes) () 07/01/2011 postreply 15:57:17

• coal fired station energy conversion is 30%. -sweetptt- ♂ 给 sweetptt 发送悄悄话 sweetptt 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2011 postreply 16:05:29

• 看楼下akm的回帖。电池的能耗是恐怖的。降解是漫长需要安全考量的。 -wxc1894- ♀ 给 wxc1894 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2011 postreply 16:40:38

• "恐怖的", what does it mean really in a scientific or commerical wa -longterminvestor- ♂ 给 longterminvestor 发送悄悄话 longterminvestor 的博客首页 (66 bytes) () 07/01/2011 postreply 21:30:27

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！