是投资，还是大出血。

是投资，还是大出血。

俺看了很多贴子，受益匪浅。但也有个别贴，让人觉得是匪夷所思。有个贴子说
(Input King is too hard, switch to English)
LZ has a rental property that worth $700K and rented at $2,500 monthly.Let's assume you get 100% morgage. It should be $4,200. Plus property tax and other costs, your monthly cost is $5,000. You are subsidizing your tenant $2,500 a month! This is not investment in Reality. This is 大出血.

所有跟帖： 

• 你只看到它的一面。若property有5%一年的appreciation又如何？ -iamfarmer- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 07:56:42

• 请问:如果不是low income, 出租房的mortgage, interest, expense etc -monkeyMa- ♀ (75 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 07:57:40

• 刚刚有个置顶的帖子，没看吗？就是讲这个的。农民以前也有讲。 -Iamfarmer- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 08:02:17

• 看到了.谢谢.看来我是没希望减税了.我的情况:positive cash flow -monkeyMa- ♀ (44 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 08:07:03

• 别急，慢慢耒。三班长曾推荐几本书，先找耒看看。 -小小石头- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 08:43:39

• You got the point of any investing, not only in RE. -2526- ♂ (716 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 09:04:38

• 哈哈，难怪连一直唱衰房市的poorkids都有好几处房子，怕做LOSER啊:) -britannica- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 12:45:48

• real esate would be one of the negative real return -it888- ♀ (150 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 19:24:30

• that"s why bay area investor only can afford a few -jy101- ♂ (174 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 12:30:04