When housing becomes only investment vehicle

the risks becomes very obvious.

House's intrinsic value is to meet human basic needs. Any thing beyond it bears increased risks.

Nature of economy can not be defied. Policy may alter the time component of it but can not alter the course.

It is not the housing sector that govenment is worried about it, it is the political stability that brought by unployment that really worrys them. Chinese foreign policies, monetary policies and domestic political policies, are all centered around this worry.

So housing's future will be influenced by many unforseen factors and events, domestic and foreign. I do not believe anyone including "Guru"s here can safely predict what will happen to Chinese market.

所有跟帖： 

• "总算"?:) -天下无马- ♂ (432 bytes) () 12/29/2010 postreply 11:12:30

• 说对了， 俺完全同意。不可否认，第一驴知识丰富。 -比花花还花- ♂ (66 bytes) () 12/29/2010 postreply 10:58:38

• No need。 -天下无马- ♂ (106 bytes) () 12/29/2010 postreply 11:15:17

• that is very right, China is unpredictable, the time bomb is tic -longterminvestor- ♂ (90 bytes) () 12/29/2010 postreply 11:08:29

• 其实说来说去，房地产能保持目前的高位，主要是资金管制。 -trendspike- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/29/2010 postreply 13:55:30