no, "most asset is in accounts with beneficiaries" is no substit

来源: 美西游子 于 2010-10-31 12:34:59 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (1701 bytes)

no, "most asset is in accounts with beneficiaries" is no substitute.  误区.  就像 "Joint Tenancy With Right of Survivorship" is no substitute 一样.

here is article by Suze Orman.

http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/moneymatters/1281


所有跟帖： 

• Thanks -JR98- ♂ 给 JR98 发送悄悄话 JR98 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/31/2010 postreply 12:41:57

• Read it. 还是有钱人的烦恼。 -Morning3evening4- ♂ 给 Morning3evening4 发送悄悄话 Morning3evening4 的博客首页 (873 bytes) () 10/31/2010 postreply 13:07:29

• A-mao, actually the trust can work out perfect in this case... -jy101- ♂ 给 jy101 发送悄悄话 jy101 的博客首页 (1275 bytes) () 10/31/2010 postreply 15:01:56

• Yes, if there is more than enough money. -Morning3evening4- ♂ 给 Morning3evening4 发送悄悄话 Morning3evening4 的博客首页 (489 bytes) () 10/31/2010 postreply 15:14:22

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！