Random itself may be pseudo.

Thanks for your article. There are many good points. I agree most of TA are garbage. But I disagree with you on denying on any TA methods. I beleive there are very few people are making real money with their own models.

There is a assumption in your theory is the stock market is random. All the statistic anylisys is based on the randomness of the market. But random itself is a question. There could be no real randomness in the real world. All the randomness we observed are pseudo random which are composited of many irrelevent predictable events. It's true you can use statistic theory to analyze the random. It's also true someone can predict the market if he happens to find one of the predictable event that's part of the random process.