看我这篇文章

回答: Compared to competitors like Google (with DeepMind),晓炎2025-08-14 04:22:09

The Platform Isn't the Product, It's the Institutional Foundation
Meta, Palantir, and Oracle are AI's end-game companies because they facilitate institutional implementation, unlike fleeting tech startups.

End-Game Platforms: A New Reality
Dismissed as "old," Meta, Oracle, and Palantir became AI leaders by mid-2025:
 * Meta: AI social ecosystem leader.
 * Oracle: Dominates government AI deployments.
 * Palantir: U.S. military/NATO digital backbone.
AI's true winners are platform companies where institutions embed their systems.
What Defines a Platform?
A platform is a foundational structure for others' systems—like a power grid. They are AI's true access points. Examples: Meta, Palantir, Oracle.
Key Institutional Platform Features
 * Broad Interfaces: Enable diverse operations (e.g., Meta APIs, Palantir linking agencies).
 * Deep Data Structures: Capture institutional graphs, supporting critical functions like national security.
 * High Institutional Embeddability: Governments rely on them due to standard interfaces, controllable deployment, auditing, and security—a trust matrix.
Responsibility, Not Just Functionality
Institutions prioritize accountability. They demand:
 * Responsibility to the state (auditable)?
 * Responsibility to users (data custody)?
 * Responsibility for the future (sustainable)?
 * Responsibility for risks (traceability)?
 * Responsibility for errors (accountability paths)?
This is why the U.S. government chooses Palantir for military AI, Oracle for government data, and Meta for social AI—not just powerful models like OpenAI. They provide responsibility paths and governance authority.
The End-Game: Institutional Dependence
True end-game platforms become institutionally indispensable. They move from "tools" to "part of institutional processes," then "part of the institution itself." Changing them means overhauling laws, budgets, and training.
Institutions value "assumability": can it be taken over, controlled, and governed if it fails or grows? Platforms meet these demands through architectures supporting fault tolerance, auditing, and clear responsibilities.
Platforms: Institutions' Last Defense
Institutions prioritize stability, reliability, and accountability. Platforms accept regulatory design, providing accountable entities.
They embody AI's "institutional persona": Meta for social narratives, Oracle for fiscal/healthcare data, Palantir for mission-critical responsibility.
They are not just winners; they are the chosen hosts for institutions to ensure their continuity. Technology changes, but institutional continuity cannot. Platforms provide the replicable, maintainable structures for civilization to endure. They are the steel rails upon which civilization lands.

所有跟帖: 

So nice! Now you are bringing my confidence back lol… -晓炎- 给 晓炎 发送悄悄话 晓炎 的博客首页 (120 bytes) () 08/14/2025 postreply 04:33:56

我不看好PLTR 却不断的被打脸,不买也不空,哈哈,其实ARKK有不少PLTR -BrightLine- 给 BrightLine 发送悄悄话 BrightLine 的博客首页 (36 bytes) () 08/14/2025 postreply 05:14:24

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!