子弹有限了, 计划回调时二选一, 两个性质不同, 股性各异的,您选哪个?

个人情况不同,不求统一答案,我只是想听听各位的思维方式

GROK: BRK-B VS PANW

To compare the market performance of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) and Palo Alto Networks (PANW), I’ll analyze their stock price trends, returns, and key metrics using the provided real-time financial data, focusing on short-term (1 month), medium-term (1 year), and long-term (since 2012 for PANW, 2003 for BRK.B) performance. All prices are in USD, and I’ll prioritize the given data as the most trusted source.

1. Stock Price Overview (as of May 1, 2025)

  • BRK.B:
    • Current Price: $531.384
    • 52-Week Range: $396.35 - $539.00
    • Market Cap: $1,136.51 billion
    • Year High/Low: $539.00 / $396.35
  • PANW:
    • Current Price: $187.859
    • 52-Week Range: $142.00 - $208.39
    • Market Cap: $123.77 billion
    • Year High/Low: $208.39 / $142.00

2. Short-Term Performance (1 Month: April 1 - May 1, 2025)

  • BRK.B:
    • April 1: $533.60
    • May 1: $531.384
    • Return: ($531.384 - $533.60) / $533.60 = -0.42%
    • Trend: Slight decline, with fluctuations between $486.50 and $533.99. The stock dipped notably around April 4 ($493.49) but recovered toward the end of the month.
  • PANW:
    • April 1: $171.80
    • May 1: $187.859
    • Return: ($187.859 - $171.80) / $171.80 = +9.35%
    • Trend: Strong upward movement, starting at $171.80 and climbing steadily, with a peak around April 30 ($188.01) before a slight dip.
  • Comparison: PANW significantly outperformed BRK.B in the past month, gaining over 9% while BRK.B saw a marginal loss. PANW’s growth reflects strong momentum in cybersecurity, while BRK.B’s diversified portfolio moved more conservatively.

3. Medium-Term Performance (1 Year: May 2024 - May 2025)

  • BRK.B:
    • May 2024: $414.40
    • May 2025: $531.384
    • Return: ($531.384 - $414.40) / $414.40 = +28.23%
    • Trend: Consistent upward trajectory, with notable growth from $414.40 to a peak of $539.00. Monthly data shows steady gains, especially from September 2024 ($460.26) onward.
  • PANW:
    • May 2024: $147.455
    • May 2025: $187.859
    • Return: ($187.859 - $147.455) / $147.455 = +27.40%
    • Trend: Volatile but upward, with a low of $142.00 and a high of $208.39. PANW saw dips in March 2025 ($170.64) but rebounded strongly in April.
  • Comparison: BRK.B slightly outperformed PANW over the year, with a more stable upward trend. PANW’s higher volatility reflects its tech sector exposure, while BRK.B’s diversified holdings provided steadier gains.

4. Long-Term Performance (Since 2012 for PANW, 2003 for BRK.B)

  • BRK.B:
    • 2003: $58.30
    • May 2025: $531.384
    • Return: ($531.384 - $58.30) / $58.30 = +811.30%
    • Annualized Return: ~10.8% (over 22 years)
    • Trend: Remarkable long-term growth, with steady compounding driven by Warren Buffett’s value investing strategy. Key milestones include crossing $200 in 2017 and $400 in 2023.
  • PANW:
    • 2012: $8.8017
    • May 2025: $187.859
    • Return: ($187.859 - $8.8017) / $8.8017 = +2034.59%
    • Annualized Return: ~28.9% (over 13 years)
    • Trend: Explosive growth since its IPO, driven by its leadership in cybersecurity. PANW surged from $40.345 in 2019 to $187.859, with a peak of $208.28 in February 2025.
  • Comparison: PANW’s long-term returns dwarf BRK.B’s due to its high-growth tech profile, but BRK.B offers lower risk and consistency. PANW’s performance is tied to cybersecurity demand, while BRK.B’s diversified conglomerate structure mitigates sector-specific risks.

5. Volatility and Risk

  • BRK.B:
    • 1-Year Range: $396.35 - $539.00 (36% range relative to low)
    • Stable price movements, reflecting its diversified holdings in insurance, railroads, and equities like Apple.
    • No P/E ratio or dividend yield provided, suggesting valuation is driven by intrinsic value and cash flows rather than traditional metrics.
  • PANW:
    • 1-Year Range: $142.00 - $208.39 (46.7% range relative to low)
    • Higher volatility, typical of tech stocks. Beta is 1.07, indicating slightly above-market volatility.
    • Trailing P/E: 86.04; Forward P/E: 44.90, reflecting high growth expectations but potential overvaluation.
  • Comparison: BRK.B is less volatile, benefiting from its broad portfolio, while PANW’s price swings reflect tech sector dynamics and cybersecurity market sentiment.

6. Recent Financial Highlights

  • BRK.B:
    • No specific earnings data provided, but its market cap ($1.14 trillion) reflects its scale. Its insurance operations (e.g., GEICO) and investments (e.g., Apple) drive steady cash flows.
    • Performance is tied to Buffett’s long-term value investing, focusing on undervalued businesses with strong fundamentals.
  • PANW:
    • Fiscal Q1 2025 (ended Oct 31, 2024): Revenue up 14% YoY to $2.1 billion; Next-Generation Security ARR up 40% to $4.5 billion.
    • Strong growth in cloud security (Prisma Cloud) and security operations (Cortex), with a 2-for-1 stock split effective December 16, 2024.
    • Analysts forecast a 1-year price target of $215.47, suggesting 14.7% upside from $187.859.
  • Comparison: PANW shows robust growth in a high-demand sector, while BRK.B’s performance is steadier, driven by diversified cash flows rather than rapid expansion.

7. Key Takeaways

  • Short-Term (1 Month): PANW (+9.35%) outperformed BRK.B (-0.42%), driven by cybersecurity momentum.
  • Medium-Term (1 Year): BRK.B (+28.23%) edged out PANW (+27.40%), with lower volatility.
  • Long-Term (Since 2012): PANW (+2034.59%) far outpaced BRK.B (+811.30% since 2003), reflecting its high-growth tech profile.
  • Risk Profile: BRK.B is a safer, diversified investment; PANW offers higher reward but with greater volatility and valuation concerns.
  • Market Context: BRK.B benefits from broad economic exposure, while PANW capitalizes on cybersecurity and AI trends.

Conclusion

For investors seeking stability and consistent long-term growth, BRK.B is the better choice due to its diversified portfolio and lower volatility. For those comfortable with higher risk and seeking growth in the tech sector, PANW offers stronger short-term momentum and long-term potential, though its high P/E suggests caution. The choice depends on risk tolerance and investment horizon.

If you’d like a deeper dive into specific financial metrics, analyst forecasts, or sector comparisons, let me know!

所有跟帖: 

我也喜欢用Grok的分析来参考,可以考虑一半一半? -Sandcity2000- 给 Sandcity2000 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/01/2025 postreply 09:20:13

+1,Grok确实好用 -ylad12231313- 给 ylad12231313 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/01/2025 postreply 09:48:41

这两个公司天差地别。我喜欢看P/E, 犹如房子现金流。 -云熙呢喃- 给 云熙呢喃 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/01/2025 postreply 09:39:05

一半一半 -gastank1289- 给 gastank1289 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/01/2025 postreply 11:00:00

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!