People have used it on weekly, daily, hourly, and 15 mins

本帖于 2025-04-28 08:04:50 时间, 由普通用户 三心三意 编辑

15 mins is a pure guess, I have not been able to reliably use it. Traditional TA indicators probably better there

hourly is not reliable either, but can give early signal to the trend, which you can combine with daily to increase the probability

所有跟帖: 

QQQ 一直有个缺口,会不会去补一下呢? 您以前也提过他回踩时不太干净,没回踩到位 -小松松- 给 小松松 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:17:08

Anything is possible :) But trend is most important. -三心三意- 给 三心三意 发送悄悄话 三心三意 的博客首页 (72 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:20:10

好的,谢谢。 -小松松- 给 小松松 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:21:03

幸好今天早上问了你一下~ -小松松- 给 小松松 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 11:28:49

用凯利公试和波浪结合,有个大概仓位比例就行了。4/4号我说QQQ390,400,420买都没任何区别。现在看是不是这样? -三心三意- 给 三心三意 发送悄悄话 三心三意 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:25:36

是的,确实没区别~ -小松松- 给 小松松 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/28/2025 postreply 08:27:54

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!