Thanks! Why is LEAP much safer? Technically I can lose about

来源: aloevera 于 2024-12-06 12:23:45 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (118 bytes)
本帖于 2024-12-06 12:24:16 时间, 由普通用户 aloevera 编辑
回答: yes, if NVDA keeps going up. NVDL is better 由 三心三意 于 2024-12-06 12:20:34

 the same value on LEAP vs. NVDL. LEAP premium is $70, whereas NVDL cost $76, not much difference. 

所有跟帖： 

• Leap only lose time value... -三心三意- ♂ 给 三心三意 发送悄悄话 (161 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:46:36

• But if it comes back, will that eat into the return as much？ -aloevera- ♀ 给 aloevera 发送悄悄话 (140 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:52:28

• If NVDA drops 40-50% and come back, NVDL lose a lot more -三心三意- ♂ 给 三心三意 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:57:27

• Not precise math (maybe someone with better math to help) .. -三心三意- ♂ 给 三心三意 发送悄悄话 (204 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 13:03:21

• That is right! Thanks for explanation!! But I hope that -aloevera- ♀ 给 aloevera 发送悄悄话 (494 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 13:18:52

• The time decay on LEAP is 11% on the premium. That is quite -aloevera- ♀ 给 aloevera 发送悄悄话 (233 bytes) () 12/06/2024 postreply 12:59:22

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！