悠着点，这条州法涉嫌违宪，会受到挑战的。

PROPERTY RIGHTS, HOUSING, AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION: THE SOCIAL BENEFITS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION, GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONS, AND THE EUROPEAN COURT ON HUMAN RIGHTS' HUTTEN- CZAPSKA DECISION*
Edward H. Ziegler** and Jan G. Laitos ABSTRACT
Nations around the world utilize government interventions to promote the availability and affordability of housing. This Article focuses on various types of government regulatory interventions, such as rent controls, building dedications and exactions, and density and growth controls on housing. These interventions are common in the United States and in other countries and may contribute to inefficient resource allocation and poor housing outcomes. This Article examines whether these types of government interventions may require, in particular cases in the United States, judicially required compensatory damages for affected property owners. The social costs of these forms of government intervention are examined from the perspective of the benefits accruing from a regime of property rights protection. This Article further explains that there is some existing precedent under international human rights norms, as illustrated by the Hutten-Czapska v. Polandi decision, for the standards used in the United States for protecting the property rights of owners and developers of housing from excessive and unwise government regulation.
 

https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/iiclr/pdf/vol21p25.pdf

所有跟帖： 

• 按citizenship限制不违宪，因为citizenship不属于protected category。 -Porcelana- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 11:16:41

• 出生地也不是吧？ -灵山问禅- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 11:20:06

• 反歧视法里的protected classes只包括这些： -Porcelana- ♀ (241 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 11:23:02

• 美国宪法保护美国土地上的所有人，所以无论人的国籍，只要跟美国国土沾上边，都是宪法保护的对象。 -小二哥李白- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/16/2023 postreply 12:59:56