That's not what happened. Paulson gave WFC the choice.

本帖于 2009-02-03 11:52:50 时间, 由普通用户 表情符号 编辑

Either now or never. That's not fair?

Again, the topic is (and I can see people keep switching the topic) IF WFC believes they are 坚不可摧, why take the money?

And why 25 billions? Why not two billions? If WFC doesn't need it?

所有跟帖: 

Paulson gave WFC no choice. -iBear- 给 iBear 发送悄悄话 (90 bytes) () 02/03/2009 postreply 10:03:35

You are too persistent. No bank is invinsible in this world., -729418- 给 729418 发送悄悄话 729418 的博客首页 (230 bytes) () 02/03/2009 postreply 10:03:44

" No bank is invinsible in this world". Tell this to the "invest -realtiger- 给 realtiger 发送悄悄话 realtiger 的博客首页 (51 bytes) () 02/03/2009 postreply 10:06:33

Exactly -Wisdom101- 给 Wisdom101 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/03/2009 postreply 10:07:13

They never think they are 坚不可摧, -Wisdom101- 给 Wisdom101 发送悄悄话 (197 bytes) () 02/03/2009 postreply 10:04:41

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!