i though

even the letter was there during the closing.  my argument is:  i am not the expert but he is,  it is the reason i spent $700 for his advising the whole transaction because his negligence cost me the $4000 damage.

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• Some clients ... -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (303 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 13:01:43

• you are wrong if you are an attorney and it is what you though -puma_bill- ♂ (179 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 13:13:46

• 这个人心里阴暗，我为租房的事曾在法坛发帖求助，被他攻击 -十里荷花香- ♀ (137 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 15:25:52

• 坏柠檬？ -sweetptt- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 18:35:50

• 小姐，要打架也來法壇打，不要背後捅刀 -單身老貓- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/30/2019 postreply 09:57:33

• Greedy attorney!!! -不开窍- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 14:13:54

• 柠檬， 你的ID被偷了？这个700是正常的价格，律师应该帮买房人搞定的， 这4000的问题， 应该要事先搞定的 -螺丝螺帽- ♀ (98 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 20:27:11

• 谢谢 -puma_bill- ♂ (30 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 20:30:22

• 谢谢 -puma_bill- ♂ (30 bytes) () 12/29/2019 postreply 20:30:22