租控是对有产阶级的掠夺,是对市场的扰乱。ZT:纽约租控让房价直接损失20%以上

来源: sweetptt 2019-08-19 21:16:13 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (3566 bytes)

https://www.naahq.org/news-publications/rent-control-nys-new-devaluation-play

What Rent Control Does

The changes, passed in June, limit how much owners of rent-regulated apartments – or approximately 1 million of the 3 million total units in New York – can invest and recoup for improvements at their buildings.

Previously, upon vacancy of a unit, owners could make improvements and then increase the rent by as much as 20 percent. If that pushed the rent over a certain threshold, the apartment could then be de-regulated, and return to being classified as a market-rate unit.

But the new rules eliminate that provision, as well as the 20 percent vacancy bonus, while limiting how much owners can spend on improving individual units to just $15,000 over 15 years.

Previously, there wasn’t a cash limit on upgrades, and owners could raise rents by 1/40th of the cost of improvements in buildings with less than 35 units, and 1/60th in building over 35 apartments. Those ratios now change to 1/168 and 1/180, respectively, under the new rules.

“You can do paint and carpets for $15,000 in New York,” Mullaney says. “It doesn’t buy a lot.”

For major capital improvements that affect an entire building – such as common area renovations, a new roof or central air conditioning system – owners previously were allowed to increase rents by as much as 6 percent per year for all residents to recoup added costs. But that type of increase is now capped at just 2 percent per year.

For owners who want to forgo running rental housing altogether and convert their building to a co-op or condo, the new rules made that significantly harder, too: Owners will now need 51 percent of residents to sign off on a proposed conversion, versus 15 percent under old rules.

“Having worked on many of those transactions during the last 20 years, that is an extremely high threshold,” Mullaney says. “If you need 51 percent of tenants, you’re basically not going to see any more co-op or condo conversions in New York.”

所有跟帖: 

这个太奇怪了,居然有政府限制landlord维修房子的总费用小于1K/year。匪夷所思吧?脑子瓦特了 -sweetptt- 给 sweetptt 发送悄悄话 sweetptt 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/19/2019 postreply 21:21:32

纽约现在是保护穷人和富人的地方,中产最好不要买6个家庭以上的房子,碰上老油条的房客欠租很难赶走我一个房客已上挺2年还没赶走。 -小团圆- 给 小团圆 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 04:59:12

租控在纽约已经存在几十年了 -越王剑- 给 越王剑 发送悄悄话 越王剑 的博客首页 (107 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 04:59:51

所以我买地,分出一小块出租,不受任何控制。 -(G)- 给 (G) 发送悄悄话 (G) 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 06:06:38

你在纽约出租地?地税也不便宜。 -小团圆- 给 小团圆 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 06:15:36

到处都有房控,政府为了社会安定,躲也躲不掉。 -(G)- 给 (G) 发送悄悄话 (G) 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 06:18:42

嗯。弱者该有的大将风度,不入险境,不涉其险。 -守月- 给 守月 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 08:50:10

柠檬说的好像是地主要勇于承担,敢于担当。割肉饲鹰,建设和谐社会 -sweetptt- 给 sweetptt 发送悄悄话 sweetptt 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 09:21:34

这篇文章讨论问题从经济上讨论,无论对错,起码对路。各位地主不要动不动就侵权违宪自由干涉之类的话。 -柠檬椰子汁- 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 柠檬椰子汁 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 07:08:12

财产权是人类繁荣富强的分界岭。当然社会主义者的理论都能自洽,你有新理论也是不惊诧的 -sweetptt- 给 sweetptt 发送悄悄话 sweetptt 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 09:25:19

你说说zoning是不是干涉了你的财产权?为什么你不能在居民区建工厂? -柠檬椰子汁- 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 柠檬椰子汁 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 11:13:45

那就接着讨论经济问题呀。怎么上来先占领道德制高点?为什么总是地主们的不是? -freedom321- 给 freedom321 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/20/2019 postreply 12:25:10

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”