what? 'fired' is not 'firing at the enemy'.

misconduct is an arguable term. there are many reasons for someone to be fired. i see no reason that he could not apply for the benefits. was he fired because he stole something? was he fired because he damaged something on purpose? was he fired because he did not come to work for days? was he fired because he was playing pingpong for 8 hours without working? if not, why couldn't he apply for the benefits?

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：what? 'fired' is not 'firing at the enemy'. -ca2004- ♀ (30 bytes) () 11/16/2008 postreply 17:46:28

• if the company lays only one off, then he is fired. -youaresmart- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/16/2008 postreply 17:51:04

• 回复：if the company lays only one off, then he is fired. -ca2004- ♀ (138 bytes) () 11/16/2008 postreply 17:53:25

• 你听ca2004的八？她说的没有错。我们这里就象她说的那样。。。 -月半婆婆- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/16/2008 postreply 18:00:53