But IRS explanation is final

来源: 越王剑 于 2017-12-27 16:03:50 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (126 bytes)

even document on their site said otherwise. Their internal explanations are final. Such misconduct happened before.

所有跟帖： 

• IRS is not final， supreme court is final -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 柠檬椰子汁 的博客首页 (347 bytes) () 12/27/2017 postreply 16:22:17

• 估计很快会有人起诉IRS -徒劳- ♂ 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 徒劳 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/27/2017 postreply 16:31:50

• 这个需要IRS先audit，否则起诉时机不到 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 柠檬椰子汁 的博客首页 (100 bytes) () 12/27/2017 postreply 16:40:00

• Unless you have money to sue -越王剑- ♂ 给 越王剑 发送悄悄话 越王剑 的博客首页 (94 bytes) () 12/27/2017 postreply 16:41:51

• Of course not me, but the blue states will -徒劳- ♂ 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 徒劳 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/27/2017 postreply 17:06:59

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！