Then R.E should be better investment than 401k

Long term u.s home price gain 6.15% (Inflation + GDP), plus say ~6.35% rental yield, that's 12.5%, assuming 40yr deprecation, and maybe 1% tax, you got 9% return.

No tax and with leverage, looks like much better ROI than 401k. if 阿贝's 401k theroy holds, RE is definitely better, agree?

所有跟帖: 

Tiger Woods aksed a similar question. -屋漏痕- 给 屋漏痕 发送悄悄话 屋漏痕 的博客首页 (179 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 07:59:03

Like the Analogy - I want to be an average NBA player -szhou888- 给 szhou888 发送悄悄话 szhou888 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 08:25:21

Not sure about you. I've given up on any professional sports. -屋漏痕- 给 屋漏痕 发送悄悄话 屋漏痕 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:50:01

I look at "leveraging" point of view, RE is a lot better because -miat42- 给 miat42 发送悄悄话 miat42 的博客首页 (505 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 08:46:42

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!